Coding agent

Factory Droid

Composable coding agent with autonomy tiers, worktrees, and custom workers.

Status
Active
License
Proprietary
Evidence
Documented, 17 sources
Product record checked
2026-07-27

At a glance

Factory's proprietary agent combines an interactive CLI, structured headless execution, IDE integrations, many hosted or local models, MCP, custom subagents, worktrees, and tiered permission levels from read-only analysis to deployment workflows.

Good choice if

  • Composable terminal and CI workflows that need structured streams and explicit autonomy tiers
  • Parallel changes isolated through named Git worktrees and custom delegated workers
  • Teams combining Factory-hosted models, BYOK providers, local Ollama, MCP, and IDE context

Check before choosing

  • The Beta OS sandbox is opt-in; its default per-command mode confines shell children while the main Droid process remains outside the OS boundary
  • Sandbox file reads allow all paths unless explicitly denied, allowed network domains remain exfiltration channels, and Factory recommends a container or VM for untrusted code
  • Git worktrees isolate file changes, not processes; dirty headless worktrees are preserved for review rather than silently removed
See 5 more considerations
  • Droid Control provides browser and desktop automation through a plugin rather than the minimal core tool set
  • Hooks run automatically with the current environment's credentials and may block tools or merge in plugin-provided code, so project and plugin hooks must be reviewed as trusted execution
  • Session rewind and file snapshots do not reverse external side effects, and persistent knowledge relies on explicit AGENTS.md or memory files rather than learned product memory
  • CLI session mirroring to Factory web is enabled by default and must be disabled with cloudSessionSync when local-only conversation storage is required
  • Factory publishes selected benchmark scorecards, but its public repository does not expose the closed agent implementation or a complete immutable evaluation corpus

Why it qualifies as a coding harness

This confirms category fit, not product quality. Every required criterion links back to first-party evidence.

Qualifies4 of 4 required criteria evidenced
  • Adaptive agent loop

    Documented

    The system repeatedly observes results and chooses the next action instead of following a fixed one-pass graph.

  • Repository tool execution

    Documented

    The system can use tools to inspect and change a repository or its execution environment.

  • Task-aware context management

    Documented

    The runtime assembles, updates, compacts, retrieves, or persists task-relevant context while work proceeds.

  • Model-independent runtime control

    Documented

    Permissions, budgets, interruption, policy, or stop controls operate outside the model's own text generation.

Membership establishes category fit only. It does not score quality, safety, autonomy, model capability, or benchmark performance. · Read the membership rule.

How it works under the hood

Seven mechanisms mapped from first-party records. These labels describe what the harness provides, not how intelligent its model is.

7/7layers documented
  • Execution & isolationSandbox availableDocumented mechanism, not a performance score.
  • Tooling & integrationsExtensible + browserDocumented mechanism, not a performance score.
  • Context & stateManaged contextDocumented mechanism, not a performance score.
  • Lifecycle & recoveryCheckpoint/rewindDocumented mechanism, not a performance score.
  • ObservabilityStructured tracesDocumented mechanism, not a performance score.
  • VerificationTool-assistedDocumented mechanism, not a performance score.
  • Governance & permissionsPolicy controlsDocumented mechanism, not a performance score.

Public code audit

Unrankedsupport-only repository
Security policy
Not found
CI workflow
Present at inspected commit
Automated tests
Not found
Evaluation assets
Present at inspected commit
Contributor documentation
Not found

The public support tree contains product documentation, selected benchmark pages, and six documentation workflows, but no Droid implementation, engineering tests, security policy, contributor guide, complete eval corpus, or immutable result record. Published scorecards are vendor evidence and remain separate from fit scoring.

Inspect commit 7ea5f9c2fcde446e1628a33f922f421616761f79, checked 2026-07-27

Measured configurations

No benchmark run passes the full metadata admission policy for this harness yet. Missing data is not scored as zero.

Benchmark policy and all runs

Capability support

Documented first-class product support, checked against the sources below.

External tools (MCP)
DocumentedProduct-supported MCP integrationSource · checked 2026-07-27The source establishes the mechanism, not its quality or availability in every mode.
Local models
DocumentedLocal or self-hosted model pathSource · checked 2026-07-27The source establishes the mechanism, not its quality or availability in every mode.
Agent parallelism
DocumentedDelegated or parallel agent workflowSource · checked 2026-07-27The source establishes the mechanism, not its quality or availability in every mode.
Runs without an open UI
DocumentedNon-interactive or automation surfaceSource · checked 2026-07-27The source establishes the mechanism, not its quality or availability in every mode.
Browser control
DocumentedBuilt-in or product-supported browser controlSource · checked 2026-07-27The source establishes the mechanism, not its quality or availability in every mode.
Isolated execution
OptionalBeta OS sandbox; opt-inSource · checked 2026-07-27Per-command mode contains shell children while the main Droid process remains outside the boundary.
Undo file changes
DocumentedInteractive session rewindSource · checked 2026-07-27Rewind does not reverse external side effects.

Primary evidence

Each capability claim is tied to a first-party record and a verification date.

Product record checked 2026-07-27
View 9 additional sources
Execution and control1 sources
Agents, state and recovery1 sources
Automation and extensions2 sources
Enterprise and operations2 sources
Releases and public code audit3 sources