Coding agent

Grok Build

Extensible Rust coding agent with plan review, sandbox profiles, and ACP.

Status
Active
License
Apache-2.0 first-party code
Evidence
Documented + code-verifiable, 24 sources
Product record checked
2026-07-27

At a glance

SpaceXAI's open-source terminal coding agent with TUI, headless and ACP surfaces, custom models, MCP, plugins, default-on subagents, plan review, rewind, permissions, and optional OS-level sandbox profiles.

Good choice if

  • Plan-review-execute workflows with explicit diffs and permission controls
  • Terminal, CI, or ACP integrations that need structured output and resumable sessions
  • Extensible setups using MCP, plugins, subagents, custom models, and worktrees

Check before choosing

  • The OS sandbox is off by default; strict/read-only child-network blocking is Linux-only, in-process model and web traffic remains outside that rule, and sensitive paths such as ~/.ssh require explicit deny configuration
  • Worktrees isolate checkouts rather than processes, while always-approve can skip tool prompts unless enterprise requirements explicitly disable bypass mode
  • Cross-session memory is optional and off by default; rewind restores recorded session/file state but does not undo remote services, browser actions, already-started processes, or other external side effects
See 3 more considerations
  • Browser review is supplied through plugins or MCP rather than a core browser tool, and web fetch is separately gated
  • The product remains beta with a rapid 0.2.x cadence; the public repository is a periodic monorepo sync, has no public CI workflow, and does not accept external contributions
  • The statement that Grok 4.5 powers the product is model branding, not evidence of harness quality; no complete independent product benchmark is imported

Why it qualifies as a coding harness

This confirms category fit, not product quality. Every required criterion links back to first-party evidence.

Qualifies4 of 4 required criteria evidenced
  • Adaptive agent loop

    Documented

    The system repeatedly observes results and chooses the next action instead of following a fixed one-pass graph.

  • Repository tool execution

    Documented

    The system can use tools to inspect and change a repository or its execution environment.

  • Task-aware context management

    Documented

    The runtime assembles, updates, compacts, retrieves, or persists task-relevant context while work proceeds.

  • Model-independent runtime control

    Documented

    Permissions, budgets, interruption, policy, or stop controls operate outside the model's own text generation.

Membership establishes category fit only. It does not score quality, safety, autonomy, model capability, or benchmark performance. · Read the membership rule.

How it works under the hood

Seven mechanisms mapped from first-party records. These labels describe what the harness provides, not how intelligent its model is.

7/7layers documented
  • Execution & isolationSandbox availableDocumented mechanism, not a performance score.
  • Tooling & integrationsExtensible toolsDocumented mechanism, not a performance score.
  • Context & statePersistent stateDocumented mechanism, not a performance score.
  • Lifecycle & recoveryCheckpoint/rewindDocumented mechanism, not a performance score.
  • ObservabilityStructured tracesDocumented mechanism, not a performance score.
  • VerificationTool-assistedDocumented mechanism, not a performance score.
  • Governance & permissionsPolicy controlsDocumented mechanism, not a performance score.

Public code audit

3/5public artifacts present
Security policy
Present at inspected commit
CI workflow
Not found
Automated tests
Present at inspected commit
Evaluation assets
Not found
Contributor documentation
Present at inspected commit

The periodic public monorepo sync contains 438 test-like files, implementation guides, and one memory-benchmark example but no public CI workflow or complete coding-task evaluation suite. External contributions are not accepted, and the sync may not exactly identify the shipped binary source revision.

Inspect commit b41c75a578f98bddbd326ab02cd53618451d97ee, checked 2026-07-27

Measured configurations

No benchmark run passes the full metadata admission policy for this harness yet. Missing data is not scored as zero.

Benchmark policy and all runs

Capability support

Documented first-class product support, checked against the sources below.

External tools (MCP)
DocumentedProduct-supported MCP integrationSource · checked 2026-07-27The source establishes the mechanism, not its quality or availability in every mode.
Local models
DocumentedLocal or self-hosted model pathSource · checked 2026-07-27The source establishes the mechanism, not its quality or availability in every mode.
Agent parallelism
DocumentedDelegated or parallel agent workflowSource · checked 2026-07-27The source establishes the mechanism, not its quality or availability in every mode.
Runs without an open UI
DocumentedNon-interactive or automation surfaceSource · checked 2026-07-27The source establishes the mechanism, not its quality or availability in every mode.
Browser control
Not documentedNo first-class support established by the current recordAbsence of current documentation is not proof that the capability is impossible.
Isolated execution
OptionalOptional OS sandbox profiles; disabled by defaultSource · checked 2026-07-27Network and filesystem coverage varies by platform and selected profile.
Undo file changes
DocumentedProduct-supported file or session rollbackSource · checked 2026-07-27The source establishes the mechanism, not its quality or availability in every mode.

Primary evidence

Each capability claim is tied to a first-party record and a verification date.

Product record checked 2026-07-27
View 16 additional sources
Product and interfaces3 sources
Execution and control1 sources
Agents, state and recovery3 sources
Automation and extensions2 sources
Enterprise and operations4 sources
Releases and public code audit3 sources