Coding agent

Kimi Code

Multi-provider CLI with parallel subagents and local web or IDE surfaces.

Status
Active
License
MIT
Evidence
Documented + code-verifiable, 18 sources
Product record checked
2026-08-20

At a glance

Moonshot AI's MIT-licensed coding harness provides a terminal UI, structured print mode, multi-provider routing, MCP, skills, plugins, hooks, ACP editor integration, a local web service, installable Computer Use and WebBridge tooling, trace inspection, and parallel foreground or background subagents.

Good choice if

  • Parallel coding work that uses foreground, background, or swarm-style subagents
  • Teams switching among Kimi, Anthropic, OpenAI-compatible, Gemini, Vertex, and local providers
  • One harness shared across a TUI, structured automation, ACP editors, and a local web interface

Check before choosing

  • Local shell and file tools run with host privileges; no first-party OS sandbox is documented
  • Print mode switches to an unattended auto-permission posture; its background Bash and subagent defaults have no practical wall-clock limit unless configured
  • Hooks fail open on errors or timeouts and must not be the sole barrier for high-risk actions
See 5 more considerations
  • AgentSwarm can ramp without a configured concurrency cap, while delegated agents inherit the caller's allowed permission rules
  • The local web service uses loopback and bearer authentication by default, but --dangerous-bypass-auth exposes sessions, files, and shell access to anyone who can reach the port
  • Plugins may inject system-prompt instructions, custom agents, skills, hooks, and MCP servers; third-party and custom sources require explicit trust and user-global installs are not project-scoped
  • Kimi Code 0.34.0 preserves completed, cancelled, or failed turn state across server restarts and adds one-click web resume, but session recovery still does not restore repository files or reverse external effects
  • Since 0.35.0, the built-in coder subagent no longer delegates recursively by default; custom profiles can still opt in to Agent or AgentSwarm tools and their inherited authority

Capability support

Documented first-class product support, checked against the sources below.

External tools (MCP)
DocumentedProduct-supported MCP integrationSource · checked 2026-07-27The source establishes the mechanism, not its quality or availability in every mode.
Reusable skills
DocumentedProduct-supported reusable skill packagesSource · checked 2026-07-27Support does not establish portability, package quality, safety, or adoption.
Local models
DocumentedLocal or self-hosted model pathSource · checked 2026-07-27The source establishes the mechanism, not its quality or availability in every mode.
Agent parallelism
DocumentedDelegated or parallel agent workflowSource · checked 2026-07-27The source establishes the mechanism, not its quality or availability in every mode.
Runs without an open UI
DocumentedNon-interactive or automation surfaceSource · checked 2026-07-27The source establishes the mechanism, not its quality or availability in every mode.
Browser control
OptionalInstallable first-party Kimi Computer Use capability with WebBridge browser integrationSource · checked 2026-08-10Availability depends on installing the official capability and browser bridge; the release does not turn ordinary host tools into a sandboxed browser boundary.
Isolated execution
Not documentedNo first-class support established by the current recordAbsence of current documentation is not proof that the capability is impossible.
Undo file changes
Not documentedNo first-class support established by the current recordAbsence of current documentation is not proof that the capability is impossible.

Getting started

Install the Kimi Code binary, log in or configure providers, then use `kimi`, `kimi -p`, `kimi acp`, or `kimi web` for the required surface.

Open official documentation

Classification and operating model

Category fit and technical mechanisms are evidence records, not product-quality scores.

Category fit
Qualifies, 4/4 criteria
Operating model
7/7 layers documented
Inspect category criteria and operating mechanismsFirst-party records

Why it qualifies as a coding harness

This confirms category fit, not product quality. Every required criterion links back to first-party evidence.

Qualifies4 of 4 required criteria evidenced
  • Adaptive agent loop

    Documented

    The system repeatedly observes results and chooses the next action instead of following a fixed one-pass graph.

  • Repository tool execution

    Documented

    The system can use tools to inspect and change a repository or its execution environment.

  • Task-aware context management

    Documented

    The runtime assembles, updates, compacts, retrieves, or persists task-relevant context while work proceeds.

  • Model-independent runtime control

    Documented

    Permissions, budgets, interruption, policy, or stop controls operate outside the model's own text generation.

Membership establishes category fit only. It does not score quality, safety, autonomy, model capability, or benchmark performance. · Read the membership rule.

How it works under the hood

Seven mechanisms mapped from first-party records. These labels describe what the harness provides, not how intelligent its model is.

7/7layers documented
  • Execution & isolationHost processDocumented mechanism, not a performance score.
  • Tooling & integrationsExtensible + browserDocumented mechanism, not a performance score.
  • Context & stateManaged contextDocumented mechanism, not a performance score.
  • Lifecycle & recoverySession resumeDocumented mechanism, not a performance score.
  • ObservabilityStructured tracesDocumented mechanism, not a performance score.
  • VerificationTool-assistedDocumented mechanism, not a performance score.
  • Governance & permissionsApproval promptsDocumented mechanism, not a performance score.

Measured and public context

Configuration-specific measurements and source-native activity stay separate from general product capability.

Inspect code audit, measured configurations, and ecosystem signalsContext, not a product score

Public code audit

4/5public artifacts present
Security policy
Present at inspected commit
CI workflow
Present at inspected commit
Automated tests
Present at inspected commit
Evaluation assets
Not found
Contributor documentation
Present at inspected commit

The 0.29.2 tree contains 1,256 test-like files and eight workflows with security and contributor documentation. No dedicated coding-harness evaluation suite or immutable comparative result record was found; files named evaluate implement tool-policy logic rather than product benchmarks.

Inspect commit 8a45f10eddbb35c317047e82e567cdb59a220b4f, checked 2026-07-27

Measured configurations

No benchmark run passes the full metadata admission policy for this harness yet. Missing data is not scored as zero.

Benchmark policy and all runs
Context, not quality

Public ecosystem signals

Source-native observations for exact mapped artifacts and reviewed stable release trains. Different units and populations stay separate, and missing coverage is never treated as zero.

View this harness in Usage
  • Latest stable release@moonshot-ai/kimi-code@0.41.0Released 2026-09-04; 57 stable releases in 90 daysOpen release
  • Homebrew 30d events1.97KFormula: kimi-codeOpen artifact
  • npm last-month downloads154.12KPackage: @moonshot-ai/kimi-codeOpen artifact
  • Release asset downloads17.12K73 stable releases; 438 matched assetsOpen artifact
  • GitHub stars7.3KFull-source repository; 1.18K forksOpen artifact

Routing, package retrievals, release downloads, editor installs, and repository interest observe different populations. They are never added together and never affect capability evidence, classification, or measured results.

Interpretation rulesSignals checked

First-party evidence

Each capability claim links to the first-party record that supports it.

18 first-party sourcesProduct record checked

Agents, state and recovery

4 sources
View 3 more sources

Automation and extensions

1 source

Enterprise and operations

1 source

Additional first-party sources

12 sources
View 11 more sources