Agent platform

stagewise

Desktop agentic IDE for browser-aware coding and parallel worktrees.

Status
Active
License
AGPL-3.0
Evidence
Documented + code-verifiable, 27 sources
Product record checked
2026-07-27

At a glance

An open-source Electron desktop IDE that combines a full Chromium browser, multi-provider and local models, managed project context, granular diff review, and user-orchestrated parallel agent sessions.

Good choice if

  • Vibe coders who want the browser, DOM context, app preview, and code changes in one desktop workspace
  • Developers running independent agent sessions in parallel, including isolated Git worktrees
  • Teams that want cloud subscriptions, direct API providers, or local inference behind the same visual workflow

Check before choosing

  • Connected workspaces and shell commands use the host filesystem with the signed-in user's permissions; Git worktrees and the restricted JavaScript worker are not an OS or container security sandbox
  • The shipped desktop app defaults to asking before tool calls and offers smart or always-allow modes, but its private smoke-test CLI forces always-allow and is not a supported public headless interface
  • Parallel work means separate top-level agent sessions that the user coordinates; the reviewed product registers no user-facing child-agent delegation tool even though the agent-core package contains generic child-agent primitives
See 3 more considerations
  • No shipped MCP integration was found in the product docs, dependencies, or tool registry; it appears only as a future specification item
  • The advertised 87.6% average cache-hit rate has no published dataset, model mix, version pin, or reproducible method, and no independent Stagewise harness benchmark or direct scientific evaluation was found
  • The repository contains engineering tests but only a copywriting-skill evaluation asset; CONTRIBUTING says external code pull requests are not accepted even though the website invites contributions

Capability support

Documented first-class product support, checked against the sources below.

External tools (MCP)
Not documentedNo first-class support established by the current recordAbsence of current documentation is not proof that the capability is impossible.
Reusable skills
DocumentedProduct-supported reusable skill packagesSource · checked 2026-07-27Support does not establish portability, package quality, safety, or adoption.
Local models
DocumentedLocal or self-hosted model pathSource · checked 2026-07-27The source establishes the mechanism, not its quality or availability in every mode.
Agent parallelism
DocumentedDelegated or parallel agent workflowSource · checked 2026-07-27The source establishes the mechanism, not its quality or availability in every mode.
Runs without an open UI
Not documentedNo first-class support established by the current recordAbsence of current documentation is not proof that the capability is impossible.
Browser control
DocumentedBuilt-in or product-supported browser controlSource · checked 2026-07-27The source establishes the mechanism, not its quality or availability in every mode.
Isolated execution
Not documentedNo first-class support established by the current recordAbsence of current documentation is not proof that the capability is impossible.
Undo file changes
DocumentedProduct-supported file or session rollbackSource · checked 2026-07-27The source establishes the mechanism, not its quality or availability in every mode.

Getting started

Install the native desktop app, connect the project folders, choose a managed, BYOK, subscription, custom, or local model, then select the approval mode and whether parallel work should share a branch or use Git worktrees.

Open official documentation

Classification and operating model

Category fit and technical mechanisms are evidence records, not product-quality scores.

Category fit
Qualifies, 4/4 criteria
Operating model
7/7 layers documented
Inspect category criteria and operating mechanismsFirst-party records

Why it qualifies as a coding harness

This confirms category fit, not product quality. Every required criterion links back to first-party evidence.

Qualifies4 of 4 required criteria evidenced
  • Adaptive agent loop

    Documented

    The system repeatedly observes results and chooses the next action instead of following a fixed one-pass graph.

  • Repository tool execution

    Documented

    The system can use tools to inspect and change a repository or its execution environment.

  • Task-aware context management

    Documented

    The runtime assembles, updates, compacts, retrieves, or persists task-relevant context while work proceeds.

  • Model-independent runtime control

    Documented

    Permissions, budgets, interruption, policy, or stop controls operate outside the model's own text generation.

Membership establishes category fit only. It does not score quality, safety, autonomy, model capability, or benchmark performance. · Read the membership rule.

How it works under the hood

Seven mechanisms mapped from first-party records. These labels describe what the harness provides, not how intelligent its model is.

7/7layers documented
  • Execution & isolationWorkspace isolationDocumented mechanism, not a performance score.
  • Tooling & integrationsBuilt-in toolsDocumented mechanism, not a performance score.
  • Context & stateManaged contextDocumented mechanism, not a performance score.
  • Lifecycle & recoveryCheckpoint/rewindDocumented mechanism, not a performance score.
  • ObservabilityLogs/transcriptsDocumented mechanism, not a performance score.
  • VerificationTool-assistedDocumented mechanism, not a performance score.
  • Governance & permissionsApproval promptsDocumented mechanism, not a performance score.

Measured and public context

Configuration-specific measurements and source-native activity stay separate from general product capability.

Inspect code audit, measured configurations, and ecosystem signalsContext, not a product score

Public code audit

4/5public artifacts present
Security policy
Present at inspected commit
CI workflow
Present at inspected commit
Automated tests
Present at inspected commit
Evaluation assets
Not found
Contributor documentation
Present at inspected commit

The repository has 150 engineering test files, but the only eval asset found targets a copywriting skill rather than coding-harness performance; no independent benchmark is imported. CONTRIBUTING exists but says external code pull requests are not accepted, and some architecture notes lag the current tree.

Inspect commit cb38225c2b0de27e85c10f26ed46123f487fb6f8, checked 2026-07-27

Measured configurations

No benchmark run passes the full metadata admission policy for this harness yet. Missing data is not scored as zero.

Benchmark policy and all runs
Context, not quality

Public ecosystem signals

Source-native observations for exact mapped artifacts and reviewed stable release trains. Different units and populations stay separate, and missing coverage is never treated as zero.

View this harness in Usage
  • Latest stable releasestagewise@1.29.0Released 2026-08-15; 25 stable releases in 90 daysOpen release
  • GitHub stars6.81KFull-source repository; 504 forksOpen artifact

Routing, package retrievals, release downloads, editor installs, and repository interest observe different populations. They are never added together and never affect capability evidence, classification, or measured results.

Interpretation rulesSignals checked

First-party evidence

Each capability claim links to the first-party record that supports it.

27 first-party sourcesProduct record checked

Additional first-party sources

27 sources
View 26 more sources

Ecosystem context

OpenRouter apps Discovery signal only; usage rank is not used as a quality or capability score. Observed 2026-07-27.